--- Log opened Sat Oct 11 00:00:05 2008 00:36 < CIA-8> aldas * r30746 /trunk/package/audio/pulseaudio/pulseaudio.desc: * updated pulseaudio (0.9.12 -> 0.9.13) 00:36 < CIA-8> aldas * r30747 /trunk/package/gnome2/gparted/gparted.desc: * updated gparted (0.3.8 -> 0.3.9) 00:37 < CIA-8> aldas * r30748 /trunk/package/office/gnucash/gnucash.desc: * updated gnucash (2.2.5 -> 2.2.7) 00:37 < CIA-8> aldas * r30749 /trunk/package/mail/dovecot/dovecot.desc: * updated dovecot (1.1.3 -> 1.1.4) 00:37 < CIA-8> aldas * r30750 /trunk/package/multimedia/vlc/vlc.desc: * updated vlc (0.9.3 -> 0.9.4) 00:43 < CIA-8> aldas * r30751 /trunk/package/develop/scons/scons.desc: * updated scons (1.0.1 -> 1.1.0) 00:49 < CIA-8> aldas * r30752 /trunk/package/network/bacula/bacula.desc: * updated bacula (2.4.2 -> 2.4.3) 01:13 < CIA-8> aldas * r30754 /trunk/package/news/slrn/slrn.desc: * updated slrn (0.9.8.1 -> 0.9.9p1) 01:39 -!- mpp [n=user@i53876F85.versanet.de] has quit ["good night - good fight"] 02:18 < CIA-8> aldas * r30753 /trunk/package/develop/cmake/ (cmake.desc uname.patch): * updated cmake (2.4.8 -> 2.6.2) 02:41 -!- hikenboot [n=vmuser@c-75-67-11-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net] has joined #T2 10:43 [Users #t2] 10:43 [@ChanServ] [ dsoul ] [ hikenboot] [ mtr ] [ Stealth] 10:43 [ axionix ] [ felanha] [ koan ] [ Ragnarin] [ TobiX ] 10:43 [ CIA-8 ] [ gw ] [ mqueiros ] [ rxr ] 10:43 -!- Irssi: #t2: Total of 14 nicks [1 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 13 normal] 11:02 -!- mpp [n=user@i53874979.versanet.de] has joined #t2 11:33 -!- mpp_ [n=user@i5387665F.versanet.de] has joined #t2 11:40 -!- mpp [n=user@i53874979.versanet.de] has quit [Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)] 11:57 -!- mpp_ is now known as mpp 12:01 < CIA-8> rene * r30755 /trunk/package/lua/lpeg/ (lpeg.cache lpeg.desc): * updated lpeg (0.7 -> 0.8) 12:04 -!- PiP [n=pip@unaffiliated/pip] has joined #T2 12:04 < PiP> Nice 12:05 < CIA-8> rene * r30757 /trunk/package/base/screen/screen.desc: 12:05 < CIA-8> * updated screen Download tag, former uni server no longer 12:05 < CIA-8> available, use long GNU location instead 13:50 -!- PiP [n=pip@unaffiliated/pip] has left #T2 ["It's not your problem."] 13:57 < CIA-8> rene * r30756 /trunk/package/lua/lpeg/lpeg.desc: * updated lpeg (0.8 -> 0.9) 14:27 < CIA-8> rene * r30758 /trunk/package/develop/subversion/subversion.desc: * updated subversion (1.5.2 -> 1.5.3) 15:24 < CIA-8> rene * r30759 /trunk/package/gnome2/gtkmm/gtkmm.desc: * updated gtkmm (2.14.0 -> 2.14.1) 16:51 < mpp> hey 16:51 < mpp> x-compile hangs on openssl 16:51 < mpp> stage 1 16:51 < mpp> i686-t2-linux-gnu-as: unrecognized option `-PIC' 16:51 < mpp> make[1]: *** [x86cpuid-elf.o] Error 1 16:51 < mpp> any ideas ? 16:52 < mpp> has anyone successfully x-compile t2 lately ? 16:52 < mpp> i mean with a fresh system ? no previous ccache or build dirs .... 17:00 < rxr> x in stage ? guess you cross compile ? 17:01 < rxr> looked like a regression from my new AS=... default change 17:10 < mpp> its a 32-target on a 64-host 17:11 < mpp> i could need that fixed 17:11 < rxr> with "this is a cross build enabled=" 17:11 < mpp> as i would like to use 64bit host only 17:11 < mpp> to build 32bit targets 17:11 < mpp> ill check 17:12 < mpp> yes it is enabled.. (off course :-) 17:12 < mpp> btw . 17:12 < rxr> well - you would not need to have it enabled, as your 64bit system can run the "old" 32bit binaries 17:12 < mpp> purchased a phen x4 with 8gb ram 17:12 < mpp> ? 17:13 < rxr> you only need to enable the "this is a cross build" if your build host can not run the target binaries 17:13 < mpp> can i build a 32bit target on 64bit host without x-compile ? 17:13 < rxr> yes 17:13 < mpp> ah... 17:13 < mpp> cool 17:13 < mpp> so phenom x4 really kicks ass compiling t2 :-) 17:13 < rxr> but of course you found a real but, new regression will fix it as soon as I hit it (test builds running) 17:13 < mpp> cool ! 17:14 < mpp> i would be more than happy to have only 64bit build hosts 17:14 < rxr> probably fixable by overwriting the new T2 default AS= in the makeopt's of the package 17:14 < rxr> xorg-server it is failing you said ? 17:14 < mpp> xorg-server ? 17:14 < rxr> ah - sorry - openssl ... 17:14 < mpp> yes 17:14 < mpp> right 17:14 < rxr> should hit that sooner than later 17:14 < mpp> okay 17:15 < rxr> but patches welcome if you want to try it ... 17:15 < rxr> something like var_append makeopt ' ' "AS=$CC" # or so 17:16 < mpp> to the openssl package ..? 17:16 < rxr> yes 17:16 < mpp> ill try 17:17 < mpp> does the t2 minimal target runn 32bit binaries by default ß 17:17 < mpp> ? 17:17 < mpp> cause i had trouble in the past ifir correctly 17:17 < mpp> could be wrong though 17:17 < rxr> you mean the minimal package selection of the generic target? you can build it for x86-64 if you like 17:17 < mpp> yes i mean the running host 17:18 < mpp> a x86-64 host can run 32bit binaries ? 17:18 < rxr> normally yes (unless you disable CONFIG_COMPAT32 or what it was named in the linux kernel 17:18 < mpp> that step failed me when i was trying to build a 64bit target on a 32bit host 17:19 < mpp> it complained about stub-32 or something 17:19 < rxr> building stuff is another case 17:19 < rxr> you can cross build x on any host y 17:20 < mpp> however . if i do not need a 32bit host to build 32bit targets then i'll switch the remaining machine also to 64bit t2 17:20 < mpp> which would be the dl2.t2-project.org :-) 17:21 < rxr> yes, you can (except some DOS emulation fluff IIRC) any 32bit linux program on a x86-64 lilnux kernel 17:21 < mpp> k 17:21 < mpp> than dl2 will have some downtime later today or perhaps tommorow ! 17:21 < rxr> no problem 17:22 < mpp> thanx rxr 17:22 < rxr> do you work at some ISP ? 17:22 < rxr> mpp: you're welcome! 17:22 < mpp> nope - why 17:22 < rxr> because of exchanging boxes at those fixed ip's? 17:22 < mpp> ah... 17:23 < mpp> i don't understand .. 17:23 < mpp> you mean the OS ? 17:23 < mpp> thats no probl with server4you 17:23 < rxr> ah - ok - I thought you would update the hardware, too 17:23 < mpp> they have a pxe-recovery which allows you to do whatever you like on your server 17:24 < mpp> no . not possible for those low budget servers 17:24 < mpp> but theyre all 64bit amd systems 17:24 < rxr> ah 17:24 < rxr> we used to had one a weperoni (or how it was spelled) they offered similar functionality 17:25 < mpp> i'll have some blade servers for t2 stuff in the near future at my disposal in my company 17:25 < mpp> for now i use a single with 2 xeons and 4gb ram to build stuff 17:25 < mpp> theyre pretty cool 17:26 < rxr> wich root server offering do you use at server4you? they apear to srtart at 38.99/m ? 17:26 < mpp> ahm i have an old one which is not avail anymore 17:26 < mpp> i recommend the eco server 17:27 < mpp> i have the one with 2gb ram 2x160hdd and amd2 17:27 < rxr> :-) 17:27 < mpp> its called ecoserver big i think 17:27 < rxr> we have a 8-way with 8GB RAM for automated t2 builds here in the office for a year, now 17:27 < mpp> for the money the service is decent and the cpu power is suffice 17:27 < mpp> what system is it ? 17:27 < rxr> yes, looks good 17:28 < mpp> they also offer flatrate at 100mbit 17:28 < rxr> # cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep name 17:28 < rxr> model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5365 @ 3.00GHz 17:28 < rxr> ...x8 17:28 < mpp> nice ! 17:29 < mpp> but the amd phenom x4 does kick ass for a low budget 17:29 < rxr> yeah - though I need to change the virtualization setup on the box, openvz loocks it up sooner than later, somewhen between some days and months, highest uptime was just 76days or so ... 17:29 < rxr> probably will use KVM domains in the future 17:29 < mpp> yes virtual is a matter id like to talk to you 17:30 < mpp> vmware fails with all kinds of errors 17:30 < rxr> I can not recomment any of the linux "in-kernel" partitionzer (openvz/vserver) 17:30 < mpp> kvm and qemu are broken 17:30 < rxr> the "patching every syscal with domain conditionals" really hurts stability 17:30 < mpp> i can imagine 17:30 < mpp> what virt do you prupose 17:30 < mpp> i really need one on my t2 boxes 17:31 < mpp> asap actually 17:31 < rxr> well - I'm not yet in the VM business ... so ... and I historically avoided vmware ...) 17:31 < mpp> is the openvz usable ? 17:31 < rxr> for embedded and system development I use qemu for years, and kvm performance looks pretty good 17:31 < mpp> but kvm and qemu do not build with t2 trunk on my side 17:32 < rxr> mpp: openvz is only soft partitioning linux containers, and that's what I used on the 8way which is not too stable for this kind of heavy duty work) 17:32 < mpp> hmm.. 17:32 < mpp> mpp needs a vm 17:32 < rxr> ok - actually I only added kvm at a client in a hurry, and use HEAD checkouts of KVM and Qemu ... 17:32 < mpp> do they build on trunk ? 17:33 < rxr> well - Qemu SVN yes 17:33 < rxr> though our normal package should normally also buil 17:33 < rxr> d 17:33 < rxr> I can only imagine that the dyngen process fails in rare corner cases due our new gcc-4.x 17:33 < mpp> ill give it a try on one of my hosts 17:33 < rxr> but the upcomming qemu will use another codegen "technology" and no longer depend on a old GCC 17:34 < mpp> what packages do i need to select in generic target ? 17:34 < mpp> X qemu 17:34 < mpp> X kvm 17:34 < rxr> our trunk qemu is quite patched to build despite the newer gcc, which usually worked for me 17:35 < rxr> maybe kvm alone is enough for the hardware based virtualization I have to double check what kind of kvm package I actually comitted when I was abroad at a client some months ago ... 17:35 < mpp> if you find time to check if they build on trunk - i would be more than happy 17:35 < rxr> let me just finish some other C++ code I was just working on :-) 17:35 < mpp> sure 17:35 < mpp> thanx alot for the work 17:35 < rxr> oh - that reminds me - need to test the ppc64 cd from koan 17:36 < mpp> btw . i had to stop syncing the binaries for dl2 + dl2 17:36 < mpp> dl3 17:36 < mpp> the amount of hdd did go beyond the 34gb you mentioned 17:36 < rxr> hm - strange 17:36 < mpp> so for now i left only the 7.0 and trunk binaries 17:37 < mpp> and i will add binaries as requested by people 17:37 < rxr> hm - according to my "du" stable should be 36G and unstable 2G 17:37 < mpp> cause to be honest havin 2.0.0 and 6.x binaries makes rarely sence 17:37 < rxr> maybe you skip the 2.x ones and only sync 6.x and 7.x ... 17:38 < mpp> ill do so 17:38 < mpp> .. 17:38 < mpp> okay ill be afk for a few hours 17:38 < mpp> greetz to berlin. 17:38 < rxr> cu then - have some other C++ code to finish, likewise :-) 17:38 < rxr> cu then - have fun 17:39 < mpp> bye 17:47 -!- mpp [n=user@i5387665F.versanet.de] has quit ["good night - good fight"] 18:25 -!- axionix [n=axion@cpe-67-242-94-6.nycap.res.rr.com] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] --- Log closed Sun Oct 12 00:00:10 2008