--- Log opened Sun May 24 00:00:33 2009 00:18 -!- gw [n=gw@ppp118-208-91-128.lns2.bne4.internode.on.net] has joined #t2 02:53 < the_rainbow0> hello 02:53 < the_rainbow0> when doing a root overlay 02:53 < the_rainbow0> pipe files can't get copied 02:53 < the_rainbow0> and the build target process hangs 02:53 < the_rainbow0> anyway to copy the pipe files? 04:22 -!- the_rainbow0 [n=ee@41.209.167.148] has left #t2 [] 06:16 -!- gw [n=gw@ppp118-208-91-128.lns2.bne4.internode.on.net] has quit [Read error: 113 (No route to host)] 09:53 -!- gw [n=gw@ppp118-208-91-128.lns2.bne4.internode.on.net] has joined #t2 10:49 -!- the_rainbow0 [n=ee@41.209.167.145] has joined #t2 10:50 < the_rainbow0> Hello 10:50 < the_rainbow0> are you there rxr? 11:32 < rxr> yes 11:33 < rxr> special handing for pipe files could be added to the rootfs overlay copy code 11:47 < CIA-76> rene * r33241 /trunk/package/gnome2/vino/vino.desc: * updated vino (2.26.1 -> 2.26.2) 11:47 < CIA-76> rene * r33242 /trunk/package/gnome2/libgsf/libgsf.desc: * updated libgsf (1.14.13 -> 1.14.14) 11:47 < CIA-76> rene * r33243 /trunk/package/base/automake/automake.desc: * updated automake (1.10.2 -> 1.11) 11:49 < the_rainbow0> well rxr 11:49 < the_rainbow0> what about unionfs and kernel 2.6.29? 11:50 < the_rainbow0> haven't you guys updated the branch? 11:51 -!- Stealth [i=stealth@sourcemage/guru/stealth] has quit [Remote closed the connection] 11:52 -!- Stealth [i=stealth@sourcemage/guru/stealth] has joined #t2 12:05 < CIA-76> rene * r33244 /trunk/package/network/openvpn/openvpn.desc: * updated openvpn (2.1_rc15 -> 2.1_rc16) 12:06 < CIA-76> rene * r33245 /trunk/package/gnome2/anjuta/anjuta.desc: * updated anjuta (2.26.0.0 -> 2.26.2.0) 12:07 < rxr> I focus in aufs anyway 12:08 < rxr> Im not sure if I looked at unionfs for 2.6.29, yet 12:09 < CIA-76> rene * r33246 /trunk/package/gnome2/nautilus/nautilus.desc: * updated nautilus (2.26.1 -> 2.26.3) 12:20 -!- the_rainbow0 [n=ee@41.209.167.145] has left #t2 [] 13:23 -!- synchris_ [n=synchris@athedsl-197903.home.otenet.gr] has joined #t2 13:37 -!- synchris [n=synchris@pdpc/supporter/professional/synchris] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] 14:45 -!- gw_ [n=gw@ppp118-208-91-128.lns2.bne4.internode.on.net] has joined #t2 14:49 -!- gw [n=gw@ppp118-208-91-128.lns2.bne4.internode.on.net] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] 14:50 -!- gw_ [n=gw@ppp118-208-91-128.lns2.bne4.internode.on.net] has left #t2 ["Leaving"] 14:50 -!- gw [n=gw@ppp118-208-91-128.lns2.bne4.internode.on.net] has joined #t2 15:31 -!- fnordianslipeee [n=darren@94-30-69-47.xdsl.murphx.net] has quit ["leaving"] 15:39 -!- fnordianslip [n=fnordian@94-30-69-47.xdsl.murphx.net] has joined #t2 17:21 -!- mqueiros [n=mqueiros@217.70.71.134] has quit ["Ex-Chat"] 17:23 [Users #t2] 17:23 [@ChanServ] [ fnordianslip] [ LMJ] [ shevy ] [ synchris_] 17:23 [ CIA-76 ] [ gw ] [ mtr] [ Skaperen] [ TobiX ] 17:23 [ dsoul ] [ koan ] [ rxr] [ Stealth ] 17:23 -!- Irssi: #t2: Total of 14 nicks [1 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 13 normal] 17:53 -!- koan [n=koan@unaffiliated/koan] has quit ["Changing server"] 17:57 -!- koan [n=koan@koan.xlshosting.net] has joined #t2 18:34 < rxr> hi koan 18:34 < koan> hi rxr 18:56 -!- the_rainbow0 [n=ee@41.209.167.133] has joined #t2 18:57 < the_rainbow0> Hello rxr? 18:59 < rxr> yes ? 19:02 < the_rainbow0> how are you? 19:03 < rxr> fine thanks and you ? 19:04 < the_rainbow0> I'm fine thanks, t2 makes me nuts sometimes though 19:05 < the_rainbow0> I wanted to ask you about unionfs and kernel 2.6.29 19:05 < rxr> :-( 19:05 < the_rainbow0> I have a live ISO with the kernel 2.6.29 19:05 < rxr> Im not sure I test that yet as I said the other day 19:05 < rxr> I use to use aufs 19:05 < rxr> less code, less bugs 19:05 < the_rainbow0> does aufs replace unionfs? 19:06 < rxr> not all its esoteric features, but the one I use for live / overldays 19:06 < the_rainbow0> the problem is that without unionfs the liveiso flesystem is read-only 19:06 < rxr> thatis the commonly used feature set 19:06 < the_rainbow0> cool 19:06 < the_rainbow0> how can I tell the kerenl to use aufs instead of unionfs? 19:06 < the_rainbow0> kerenl* 19:07 < rxr> you only need ot have the aufs package in your build 19:07 < the_rainbow0> ah ! That's awesome 19:07 < rxr> and then rebuild the kernel (if you did not yet had) so that you get the third party aufs module 19:07 < the_rainbow0> I have the kernel alreadu built 19:07 < the_rainbow0> so I'm gonna rebuild it 19:07 < rxr> the t2 initrd scripts try to setup both, first aufs and if unavailable the older unionfs 19:07 < the_rainbow0> after I install authfs, right? 19:08 < rxr> aufs 19:08 < the_rainbow0> aufs sorry 19:08 < rxr> you only need to select the aufs package and rebuild the kernel 19:08 < rxr> you only need to rebuild the kernel due to the linux module setup 19:08 < rxr> just because aufs is a kernel _module_ you need ot have the kernel source around to compile the external module 19:08 < the_rainbow0> ahhh okay 19:09 < rxr> in t2 this is hooked up with this postlinux build script hooks 19:09 < the_rainbow0> great ! 19:09 < the_rainbow0> thanks very much man 19:09 < rxr> so that the aufs module is build when your kernel is build and the 100% matching linux kernel source is around 19:09 < the_rainbow0> okay I see 19:09 < rxr> I hope aufs works better for you 19:09 < the_rainbow0> yes I hope that too 19:09 < rxr> btw. I said this some 24++ hours before -- maybe you missed that 19:10 < rxr> might have saved you some time already ... 19:10 < the_rainbow0> lol, yes man 19:10 < the_rainbow0> the internet isn't stable here 19:10 < the_rainbow0> I live in Algeria 19:10 < the_rainbow0> so I get disconnected often 19:11 < the_rainbow0> your help is pretty valuable 19:11 < rxr> ah - ok not 254h 19:11 < rxr> just some 10h 19:11 < rxr> felt longer :-) 19:11 < rxr> http://www.t2-project.org/irclogs/t2-2009-05-24.html 19:11 < rxr> the_rainbow0: youre welcome 19:12 < the_rainbow0> I should write a FAQ or something containing all the help I got from you on IRC 19:12 < the_rainbow0> I'm sure other people will face the problems I Faced 19:12 < rxr> I already have 0 free hours ... :-( 19:13 < the_rainbow0> yes I see :D 19:13 < the_rainbow0> good luck man 19:13 < rxr> though feel free to send us homepage ideas, FAQ, articles, etc. 19:13 < rxr> http://www.t2-project.org/faq/ 19:13 < rxr> http://www.t2-project.org/zine/ 19:14 < the_rainbow0> of course, it'd be a pleasure 19:14 < the_rainbow0> but I see that the T2 community isn't very active 19:14 < the_rainbow0> comparing to gentoo or other *nix communities 19:14 < rxr> the community is very active 19:14 < rxr> just not as bit yet 19:14 < rxr> thus also external side promotion is welcome 19:15 < rxr> blog posts, forum posts, links from other linux resources to T2, etc. 19:15 < the_rainbow0> yep 19:15 < rxr> s/bit/big/ 19:15 < the_rainbow0> yes, every bit counts 19:16 < rxr> and also used in a different context compared to e.g. gentoo, that is many actual projects where custom linux (embedded) solutions are created 19:17 < the_rainbow0> yep right, T2 is pretty flexible 19:17 < the_rainbow0> and fits everything 19:19 < rxr> ok - I'm on a cellular link - gotta go - cu then 21:18 -!- RayMan72 [n=radjis@e227069.upc-e.chello.nl] has joined #t2 22:21 -!- RayMan72 [n=radjis@e227069.upc-e.chello.nl] has left #t2 ["i'm Leaving this channel"] 23:26 -!- gw_ [n=gw@staff-200-21.vpn.griffith.edu.au] has joined #t2 23:37 -!- gw [n=gw@ppp118-208-91-128.lns2.bne4.internode.on.net] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] --- Log closed Mon May 25 00:00:26 2009